Fertilizer composition and method for suspending fertilizer in an aqueous solution

ABSTRACT

A system and method for providing fertilizer for crop production in an aqueous solution comprising nano-sized fertilizer particles, which are free of any chemical side chain and free any micelle to protect the nano-sized particle from re-agglomeration, suspended therein for improved uptake by the population of the crop.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No.13/764,654, filed Feb. 11, 2013 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,334,200, issued May10, 2016) and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.61/757,675, filed Jan. 28, 2013, which are hereby incorporated byreference herein in its entirety, including but not limited to thoseportions that specifically appear hereinafter, the incorporation byreference being made with the following exception: In the event that anyportion of the above-referenced applications are inconsistent with thisapplication, this application supersedes said above-referencedapplications.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable.

BACKGROUND

The disclosure relates generally to fertilizer compositions, and moreparticularly, but not necessarily entirely, to distributing thefertilizer compositions comprising various amounts or concentrations ofnitrogen, phosphorous and potassium, as well as any other ingredientswhich may be present in fertilizer compositions such as calcium,magnesium, sulfur, boron, chlorine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, zinc,nickel, and other various nutrients, which may by distributed within anaqueous solution. Current fertilization systems generally providefertilizer in forms that are not readily usable to plant cells.Accordingly, it is common in the farming industry to provide much moreof the fertilizer composition than is actually used by the plant. Suchpractices have negative impacts on the environment, require excesstransport of chemicals that will not be used, and ultimately increasesthe cost of farming.

The features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in thedescription which follows, and in part will be apparent from thedescription, or may be learned by the practice of the disclosure withoutundue experimentation. The features and advantages of the disclosure maybe realized and obtained by use of the instruments and combinationsparticularly pointed out in the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features and advantages of the disclosure will become apparent froma consideration of the subsequent detailed description presented inconnection with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a mobile fertilizer particulation systemmade in accordance with the principles of the disclosure;

FIG. 2 is a flow chart of an implementation of methods and operations inaccordance with the principles of the disclosure;

FIG. 3A illustrates a schematic view of a mobile fertilizing systemconfigured for transporting to a site;

FIG. 3B illustrates a schematic view of a mobile fertilizing systemconfigured for transporting to a site;

FIG. 3C illustrates a schematic view of a mobile fertilizing systemconfigured for transporting to a site; and

FIG. 4 illustrates an open view of a fertilizer particulation labshowing an implementation of the principle of the disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles inaccordance with the disclosure, reference will now be made to theimplementations and embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specificlanguage will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless beunderstood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is therebyintended. Any alterations and further modifications of the inventivefeatures illustrated herein, and any additional applications of theprinciples of the disclosure as illustrated herein, which would normallyoccur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of thisdisclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the disclosureclaimed.

Before the fertilizer compositions and methods for suspending thefertilizer compositions in an aqueous solution are disclosed anddescribed, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited tothe particular configurations, process steps, ingredients and materialsdisclosed herein as such configurations, process steps, ingredients, andmaterials may vary somewhat. It is also to be understood that theterminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describingparticular embodiments and implementations only and is not intended tobe limiting since the scope of the disclosure will be limited only bythe appended claims and equivalents thereof.

The publications and other reference materials referred to herein todescribe the background of the disclosure, and to provide additionaldetail regarding its practice, are hereby incorporated by referenceherein in their entireties, with the following exception: In the eventthat any portion of said reference materials is inconsistent with thisapplication, this application supersedes said reference materials. Thereference materials discussed herein are provided solely for theirdisclosure prior to the filing date of this application. Nothing hereinis to be construed as a suggestion or admission that the inventors arenot entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior disclosure,or to distinguish the disclosure from the subject matter disclosed inthe reference materials.

In describing and claiming the subject matter of the disclosure, thefollowing terminology will be used in accordance with the definitionsset out below.

It must be noted that, as used in this specification and the appendedclaims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referentsunless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

As used herein, the terms “comprising,” “including,” “containing,”“characterized by,” and grammatical equivalents thereof are inclusive oropen-ended terms that do not exclude additional, unrecited elements ormethod steps.

As used herein, the phrase “consisting of” and grammatical equivalentsthereof exclude any element, step, or ingredient not specified in theclaim.

As used herein, the phrase “consisting essentially of” and grammaticalequivalents thereof limit the scope of a claim to the specifiedmaterials or steps and those that do not materially affect the basic andnovel characteristic or characteristics of the claimed disclosure.

As used herein, the term “ultrapure water” is intended to mean waterthat has been purified such that it measures at least 0.5 mega ohms ofresistance, and may include water having a designation to those skilledin the art of “ultrapure water.” Pure water is intended to denote waterthat is relatively reactive (when compared to water having contaminantstherein) with its surroundings due primarily to the polarized nature ofwater molecules. For example: it should be noted that, water, a tinycombination of three nuclei and ten electrons possesses specialproperties that make it unique among the more than 15 million chemicalspecies we are presently aware of and essential to all life. A watermolecule is electrically neutral, but the arrangement of the hydrogenatoms and the oxygen atom is such that a charge displacement is createdthus constituting an electric dipole, or polar molecule, with one end(the end with the hydrogen atom) being positive and the other end (theend with the oxygen atom) being negative. Because, opposite chargesattract, the negative end of one water molecule will tend to orientitself in a fashion that will bring it close to the positive end ofanother molecule that is nearby. Generally speaking, this dipole-dipoleattraction is less than that of a normal chemical bond, and is dynamicin nature. Further, this attraction causes complex structures that aretemporary in nature and thus always changing. The various structures canbe influenced by other elements (contaminants) that can provideelectrical balance for these structures, thereby stabilizing thestructures and making a body of water less reactive.

Water is a unique compound that has many different chemical and physicalproperties. For example, water molecules may include any or all of thefollowing bonding types. In water, a strong hydrogen bond is presentwith the OH covalent bond within the water molecule. A weak hydrogenbond is the bond between two water molecules. This weak hydrogen bond isalso responsible for water bonding with ammonia, for example (thusammonia's remarkably high solubility in water). Water also includesionic attraction due to their positive and negative ions. By way ofexample, sodium ions and chlorine ions have an ionic attraction, whichwill form an ionic bond creating sodium chloride. Water also experiencespermanent dipole moments, H2O, NH3, and PC13 are examples of moleculeswith a permanent dipole moment. Water may also include ion-dipoleinteractions. Sodium ions in water will create an ion-dipole interactionwhere the dipole will orient its' negative side towards the sodium (apositive ion). Chlorine ions conversely will create an ion-dipoleinteraction where the dipole will orient its' positive side towards thechlorine (a negative ion). Water may also experience dipole-dipoleinteractions. Dipoles will orient themselves with their negativelycharged side towards the other's positively charged side. Water may alsoexperience ion-induced dipole interactions. Nearby ions can distortelectron clouds (even in dipoles) temporarily changing their dipolemoments. This effect is particularly strong in larger ions such asSO22—this action can play a dominant role in compound formation. Watermay also experience dipole-induced dipole interactions. Hydrocarbons,which are non-polar in nature, may create an example of a dipole (inthis case water) creating a hydrate compound as the water dipole createsa temporary dipole out of the non-polar species (the hydrocarbons).Water may also experience dispersion (London force) interactions. Thesedipole independent forces are evidenced when we consider that nitrogenas N2 may be condensed to liquids or solids.

It will be understood that ultrapure water contains virtually noinorganic matter, such as cations, anions, solids, nor does it containorganic matter, such as carbon based material. The ASTM definition forultrapure water, as it relates to resistivity, is shown below and thisdisclosure includes through type E-4:

Type E- Type E- Type E- Parameter Type E-1 1.1 1.2^(B) 1.3^(B) Type E-2Type E-3 Type E-4 Resistivity, 18.3 18.2 18.2 18.2 16.5 12 0.5 25° C.

Ultrapure water may be established using any known protocol, but oneexemplary multi-stage process begins with: carbon filtration, softening,reverse osmosis, deionization, exposure to ultraviolet light orradiation, and sub-micron filtration. A standard step is that once theultrapure water has been established, then the ultrapure water is resentthrough the deionization process to maintain its resistivity andreactivity.

As used herein, “effective amount” means an amount of a component of thefertilizer compound that is nontoxic but sufficient to provide thedesired effect and performance at a reasonable benefit/risk ratioattending any fertilizing compound and/or composition. For example, aneffective amount of a fertilizer compound is an amount sufficient topromote the optimal or desired maturation of crops.

As used herein, “manipulated” refers to using existing fertilizer thatis on the premises of the agricultural entity, such as farmers, and hasthus already been purchased. The term “manipulated” also includeschanging the fertilizer's chemical state or size, such as decreasing theaverage compound size from a macro or micro size to a nano size, whichis 100 nanometers or less, through mixing or in some fashion alteringthe concentrations of the fertilizer. As used herein, “manipulating”does not include manufacturing fertilizer or anything that falls withinthe agricultural industry's understanding of services that fall withinthe scope of manufacturing, such as bringing fertilizer onto theagricultural entity's premises, such as farms, because that isunderstood to be a manufacturing function.

In an implementation the effective concentration of a nanoparticulatedfertilizer may be 0.053% of the amount of standard fertilizer for thesame field size wherein the established standard fertilizer usage is 40gallons per treatment for 33 acres. Typically a treatment is 40 gallonsof standard fertilizer, which equals 151.416 liters of standardfertilizer. In the implementation, 10 gallons of ultrapure water withnanoparticulated fertilizer mixed therein is estimated and shown toachieve better results than the massive amount of standard fertilizer.It will be appreciated that there is no general typical application oramount because those in the agricultural industry, such as farmers, willuse varying amounts in relation to quantities of fertilizer that may beused in an application. Thus, the disclosure contemplates a typicalreduction in the gallons of fertilizer used in the treatment of crops byamounts approaching a 50% reduction of any individual farmer's protocol.Further, the disclosure contemplates formulating, manipulating, and/orusing a standard fertilizer and reducing the amount used to less than 5%of the actual standard fertilizer contained in the ultrapure water,which makes up the quantity of an amount of liquid approaching the 50%reduction of the farmers protocol for fertilizing.

In an implementation an amount of particulated fertilizer used may be0.08 liters of particulated standard fertilizer suspended in 20 gallonsultrapure water. Accordingly, 0.08/151.416 equals 0.053% of the normalstandard fertilizer usage for the same application.

In an implementation a field or acreage that may typically require 40gallons of untreated or standard fertilizer, may only be fertilized withnanoparticulated fertilizer comprising 0.157% of the amount of standardfertilizer in a 20 gallon solution for achieving the same results forthe same field size. Accordingly, systems and methods disclosed hereinmay result in the use of use of fertilizer in a range of about 0.02% ofthe established use of standard fertilizer as a projected minimum, to amaximum projected use of about 5% of the established use of standardfertilizer in a 20 gallon solution.

By way of example, a standard 9-24-3 fertilizer was applied to a 33 acreseeded plot using 40 gallons per application. A separate 33 acre plotwas seeded 7 days later and used the composition of the disclosure,which includes the manipulated (nanoparticulated) 9-24-3 fertilizer.Only 20 gallons of the manipulated fertilizer were used per applicationand the relative amount of manipulated fertilizer comprised about 0.157liters of the manipulated fertilizer, which was concentrated into the 20gallons of fluid. Both fields were analyzed on the same date todetermine the rate of growth and the quality of the growth. After 46days from planting (46 days post planting), the field that used the 40gallons of standard fertilizer grew at an anticipated rate. On the otherhand, the field that used the 20 gallons of manipulated ornanoparticulated fertilizer (which was 39 days post planting since itwas seeded 7 days later) grew at a rate that exceeded the 40 gallonstandard fertilizer.

In the above examples, 40 gallons of standard fertilizer (in the form ofa traditional liquid fertilizer) and 10 gallons of manipulatedfertilizer and 20 gallons of manipulated fertilizer. The manipulatedfertilizer started with the traditional liquid fertilizer and thennanoparticulated the standard fertilizer and introduced it into the 10and 20 gallons of ultrapure water, respectively. The size of the liquid(standard fertilizer) used in the above examples was shown to be over5000 nanometers before the manipulation occurred, which reduced theaverage size of the compound to 100 nanometers or less. The results ofthe example show that there is more rapid growth and a higher qualitygrowth in the plant using the 10 gallons or 20 gallons of manipulatedfertilizer than there was in the 40 gallon standard fertilizer.

The success may be attributable to the fact that the manipulated,nanoparticulated fertilizer is comprised of compounds that are less than100 nanometers in at least one dimension, whereas standard fertilizercomprises compounds that are very large in comparison and maysubstantially larger than 100 nanometers and may be over 5,000nanometers in at least one dimension. It is understood that plant andanimal cells uptake a chemical moiety and compounds that are lessapproximately 100 nanometers or less without further breakdown required.Thus, use of the nanoparticulated fertilizer of the disclosure mayresult in instant access to the plant cells of the desired fertilizer,thus increasing growth and maturation of the plant, while reducingrunoff and leaching of undesirable chemicals into surrounding soil andwater systems.

With reference primarily to FIG. 1, a mobile lab system for providingnanoparticulated fertilizer to crops within a farming environment willbe discussed. As can be seen in the figure, a lab 400 may be disposedwithin a transportable and locate proximal to a crop 408 having apopulation of individual plants that may be treated simultaneously orindividually according to the implementation and needs of the crop 408.In an implementation, the lab 400 may produce a fertilizer compositionthat is intended for distribution to the crop 408 through liquiddispersion system such as an irrigation system 410. In animplementation, the lab 400 may be fluidly connected or in fluidcommunication with a holding or storage tank, facility or othercontainer 412 via fluid connector 406. The container 412 may be in fluidcommunication with an irrigation boom or other irrigation system 410through another fluid connector 407. In an implementation, the lab 400may be fluidly connected to the irrigation system 410 through a fluidconnector 406 for convenience such that nanoparticulated fertilizercontaining fluid can be dispersed in an irrigation system 410.

It will be appreciated that in any implementation the lab 400 may be aclean room having all the properties of any clean lab, such thatundesirable particles or compounds are not introduced into thenanoparticulated or manipulated fertilizer as discussed more fullyherein.

As can be seen in the figure and realized by the discussion thatfollowed, the amount of fertilizer that is effective can be greatlyreduced by preparing nanoparticulated fertilizer proximate to the cropthat is to be fertilized with the use of a mobile lab.

Referring now to FIG. 2, a method for providing nanoparticulatedfertilizer at or near the location where the nanoparticulated fertilizeris used will be discussed. FIG. 2 illustrates a flow chart of processesthat a mobile lab may employ to produce a highly effectivenanoparticulated fertilizer that may be held, stored and/or delivered ina fluid form. A fertilizer composition may be measured to determine thestandard particle size of the fertilizer in its standard form. Manyfertilizers may come in pellets, grain structures, sand like structures,etc. and may also be found in a liquid form. Liquid fertilizers may beadvantageous because it has the ability to spread the fertilizer moreeffectively and evenly than a granular fertilizer can be spread.Regardless of the standard particle size of current fertilizers, in theimplementation the absorption rate by plants can be improved by makingthe particle smaller. For example, the disclosure contemplates reducingthe chemical moiety or compound size to 100 nanometers or less, or even50 nanometers or less, in order to increase uptake into the cell. In animplementation, a nano-sized fertilizer particle implemented into acompound that is 100 nanometers or less is desired for the mosteffective absorption.

At 204, the system 200 may nanoparticulate the fertilizer composition.Any known method for nano-sizing particles is considered to be withinthe scope of this disclosure. Additionally, because of the advantages ofthe methods and systems as disclosed herein, much less fertilizer needsto be handled such that a mobile lab configuration is more than capableof processing the particles into nano-sized particles. It is to beconsidered within the scope of the disclosure to contemplate fertilizerin any physical state such as for example, solid, liquid, and gas. In animplementation, regardless of the physical state of the fertilizer, inits nanoparticulated form it may be mixed into and suspended withinwater without the fertilizer composition breaking down or dissolvinginto the water.

The system and method of nanoparticulating specific fertilizer nutrientsmay comprise, but is not necessarily limited to, nanoparticulating “N”(Nitrogen), “P” (Phosphorus) and “K” (Potassium, a.k.a potassiumchloride or muriate of potash), wherein these nutrients may be suspendedor dissolved or in some other fashion included in a high-purity waterbase.

The agricultural industry relies heavily upon NPK fertilizers in varyingrelative amounts to produce a desired result for crop development andgrowth. Different plant types, different soil types, different climateand temperate zones necessitate the need for various concentrations ofthese three elements or nutrients, namely NPK. It will be appreciatedthat other nutrients may be added to the NPK concentrations, either on amacro, micro or nano nutrient scale and are intended to fall within thescope of the disclosure.

It should be noted that the use of the terms NPK in the disclosure(which represent nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium) are used in themanner that the fertilizer industry that services the agriculturalindustry uses those terms. Thus, it will be appreciated that beforemodern lab instrumentation was developed, chemists used a gravimetric(weighing) method after ignition to determine the phosphorus andpotassium content of fertilizers in the form of phosphorus oxide (P2O5)and potassium oxide (K2O). By convention, the amounts (or analysisgrade) of phosphorus and potassium in fertilizers are still expressed inthis oxide form. The Association of American Plant Food Controlofficials have developed a uniform state fertilizer bill which says thatavailable P2O5 and soluble K2O must be guaranteed by the manufacturerand so the guaranteed analysis must still be expressed in the oxideform. Nitrogen content has always been expressed as simply N.

According to the conventional fertilizer standards and by way ofillustration, a 100 pound bag of 10-10-10 contains 10% or 10 pounds ofnitrogen, 10% or 10 pounds of P2O5 and 10% or 10 pounds of K2O. SinceP2O5 is really only 44% actual elemental phosphorus and K2O is only 83%actual elemental potassium, a 100 pound bag of 10-10-10 contains 10% or10 pounds of nitrogen, 4.4% or 4.4 pounds of elemental phosphorus and8.3% or 8.3 pounds of elemental potassium.

Perhaps the reluctance of the fertilizer industry to convert toexpressing the nutrients in the elemental forms is due to the perceptionthat less fertilizer is being purchased for the same amount of money. A100 pound bag of 10-10-10 containing N, P2O5 and K2O would be equivalentto a 100 pound bag of 10-4.4-8.3 containing N, P and K.

Once the fertilizer is added to the soil, the oxide forms, P2O5 and K2O,are no longer used when discussing these two nutrients. The amount ofthese nutrients analyzed in the soil may be expressed as the pounds peracre of P and K.

Typical NPK containing composition may comprise the following, but arenot limited to:

-   -   82-00-00 Anhydrous Ammonia    -   21-0-0 Ammonium Sulfate    -   46-0-0 Urea    -   35-0-0 Ureaform (˜85% slow release, sparingly soluble        ureaformaldehyde)    -   40-0-0 Methylene Ureas (˜70% slow release)    -   31-0-0 IsobutylideneDiurea (˜90% slow release)    -   30-0-0 to 40-00-00 Sulfur-coated Urea (slow release)    -   33-0-0 Ammonium Nitrate    -   15-0-0 Calcium Nitrate    -   13-0-44 Potassium Nitrate    -   0-17-0 to 0-22-0 Superphosphate (Monocalcium phosphate        monohydrate with gypsum)    -   0-44-0 to 0-52-0 Triple superphosphate (Monocalcium phosphate        monohydrate)    -   10-34-0 to 11-37-0 Ammonium Polyphosphate    -   11-48-0 to 11-55-0 Monoammonium Phosphate    -   18-46-0 to 21-54-0 Diammonium Phosphate    -   28-0-0    -   32-0-0    -   12-0-0    -   10-0-0    -   7-21-7    -   4-10-10    -   8-21-4    -   9-18-4    -   9-20-2    -   18-13-0    -   10-30-0

It will be understood that the composition of the disclosure includesany and all NPK containing fertilizer combinations that are currentlyknown and that may become known in the future without departing from thescope of the disclosure, including those found on the Kansas Departmentof Agriculture listing fertilizer products per fertilizer manufacture.Thus, the disclosure requires only a fraction of the manipulatedfertilizer compared with the standard fertilizer used in the industry.

At 204, the system 200 may establish a body of pure water for receivingthe nanoparticulated fertilizer compound therein. It will be appreciatedthat the method contemplates manufacturing or producing ultrapure waterat 204.

At 206, as the water is increasingly purified it may become morereactive with particulates available in the environment. Accordingly,the established body of ultrapure water may be housed in an air tightcontainer (as seen in FIG. 4) that prevents atmospheric contaminantsfrom stabilizing the water molecules within the body of ultrapure water.The unstable state of the water is desirable because it will readilyreceive a nano-sized fertilizer particle therein such that thefertilizer particle is suspended by, and stabilizes, a plurality ofwater molecules.

At 208, the system adds the nanoparticulated fertilizer composition intothe body of ultrapure water to create a mixture of fertilizer and waterreferred to herein as a fertilizer mixture. It should be noted that inan implementation, the adding process may be sealed against thesurrounding atmosphere such that the reactive ultrapure water canstabilize around a nanoparticle of fertilizer rather than acontamination particle. In other words, by isolating the mixing processagainst the atmosphere and any contaminate particles contained withinthe atmosphere, the nano-sized fertilizer particle from 204 has a veryhigh probability of becoming the nucleus of a plurality of watermolecules. In this regard, protecting against inadvertent introductionof contaminants of particles into the ultrapure water while introducingthe particulated fertilize is an important aspect that should beconsidered. Accordingly, a clean room environment should be used.

At 210, the system 200 may mix the fertilizer mixture in order toprovide an even dispersion of the fertilizer nanoparticles within thebody of ultrapure water. The mixing process may be any process that addsenergy into the mixture thereby prolonging the agglomeration, orre-agglomeration of the water molecules about a fertilizer nanoparticle,thereby allowing a modicum of control over the stabilized molecularstructures within the body of ultrapure water. It will be appreciatedthat the nanoparticles or nano-sized fertilizer particles are free ofany chemical side chain and free of any micelle used to protect thenanoparticles or nano-sized particles from re-agglomeration.

At 212, the system 200 may sample the fertilizer mixture to determinethe amount of dispersion of the fertilizer nanoparticles throughout thebody of ultrapure water. At 214, the system may further use the sampledrawn at 212 to determine the size of the fertilizer nanoparticleswithin the mixture. Additionally, at 216 the system may determine theconcentration of the fertilizer particles within the fertilizer mixture.In an implementation, such determinations may be made by a trained humanperson and/or a computer, or any combination of the two.

At 216, if the system (or operator of the system) determines that thefertilizer nanoparticles or resulting molecular structures fall outsidea desired range of about 50 nanometers to about 100 nanometers withinthe mixture and discovers the fertilizer particles or resultingmolecular structures are too large (larger than about 100 nanometers inany one dimension) for the application at hand, the fertilizer mixturecan be further processed, by further reducing the fertilizernanoparticle size at 206 or by adding additional ultrapure water intothe mixture at 220 to reduce the size of the resulting structures withinthe fertilizer mixture.

At 216, if it is determined that the size of the fertilizernanoparticles or resulting molecular structures are within the range ofabout 50 nanometers and about 100 nanometers, and it is determined thatis the appropriate or desired size and concentration of fertilizer,which has now been achieved, then the fertilizer mixture is ready foruse at 222.

At, 216 if it is determined that the size of the fertilizernanoparticles or resulting molecular structures are smaller than about50 nanometers, then additional nanoparticulated particles may be addedinto the fertilizer mixture to increase the size and concentration ofnanoparticulated fertilizer into the fertilizer mixture at 206. Forexample, at 216 the size of the fertilizer nanoparticulate and/or thechemical moiety of the fertilizer compound may be measured. Thedisclosure contemplates reducing the size of the fertilizernanoparticulate and/or the chemical moiety of the fertilizer compound to100 nanometers or less, or even 50 nanometers or less, to achieve adesired size and concentration. A range of about 50 nanometers and 100nanometers has been shown and determined to be a suitable size andconcentration range for agricultural applications. However, larger orsmaller size and concentration ranges are contemplated by thedisclosure.

On the other hand, if at 216 the system determines that the fertilizernanoparticles or resulting molecular structures within the mixture areacceptable for the application at hand, the optimized fertilizer mixturecan be applied to the crop at 222. In an implementation, the mobile labmay be in fluid communication with an irrigation system, or other fluiddispersion system, whether through a storage container or otherwise indirect communication, such that a fertilizer mixture can be directlyintroduced within the irrigation system.

FIGS. 3A-3C illustrate mobile labs 400, 500, 600, respectively, whichcan be transported by or within a motorized vehicle 510, such as a truckor tractor, or by railroad or other trailer configurations. In animplementation, the motorized vehicle 510 may leave the mobile labproximate to the crops that are to be treated for a predeterminedtreatment period. Furthermore, an implementation may include therotation and relocation of labs that are configured to specificallycorrespond to various maturation stages of a crop, or a plurality ofcrops.

Additionally, various security measures may be included for a mobilelab. The security measures may range from security personnel to productand equipment self-destruct protocols to protect the formulation offertilizer mixtures and to secure the potent and possibly dangerousnanoparticle fertilizer. FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of a cleanenvironment for the lab that may be mobilized by its placement within atrailer or train car or the like. As seen in FIG. 4, the lab 400 mayinclude an access and security door 402 for ingress and egress from thelab 400. The lab 400 may comprise equipment for manipulating standardfertilizer as discussed herein, including a nano sizer 403, one or aplurality of source fluid (which may be water) holding tanks orcontainers 404, a filter 406, a reverse osmosis filter 408, one or moreholding tanks or containers 410 for receiving manipulated fluidstherein, a deionized system and tanks 412, a mixing device or system 414for mixing nanoparticulates into ultrapure water, and a computer andinstrumentation 416 for measuring the relative sizes of thenanoparticles and manipulated fertilizer mixture.

In the foregoing Detailed Description of the Disclosure, variousfeatures of the disclosure are grouped together in a single embodimentfor the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method ofdisclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that theclaimed disclosure requires more features than are expressly recited ineach claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspectslie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosedembodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into thisDetailed Description of the Disclosure by this reference, with eachclaim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of the disclosure.

It is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are onlyillustrative of the application of the principles of the disclosure.Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised bythose skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope ofthe disclosure and the appended claims are intended to cover suchmodifications and arrangements. Thus, while the disclosure has beenshown in the drawings and described above with particularity and detail,it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerousmodifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size,materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly anduse may be made without departing from the principles and concepts setforth herein.

What is claimed is:
 1. A nanoparticulated fertilizer composition comprising: an effective amount of a nanoparticulated nitrogen-rich material as per a first volume of aqueous solution; an effective amount of a nanoparticulated phosphorus-rich material as per a first volume of aqueous solution; an effective amount of a nanoparticulated potassium-rich material as per a first volume of aqueous solution; wherein the nitrogen-rich material, the phosphorus-rich material and potassium-rich material are added to an amount of ultrapure water to thereby create the first volume of aqueous solution; and wherein an effective amount of the nanoparticulated fertilizer composition is less than 50% of a corresponding standard fertilizer composition for a predetermined application rate.
 2. The fertilizer composition of claim 1, wherein the effective amount of the nitrogen-rich material contained within the nanoparticulated fertilizer composition is less than 50% nitrogen of a corresponding standard fertilizer composition.
 3. The fertilizer composition of claim 1, wherein the effective amount of the phosphorus-rich material contained within the nanoparticulated fertilizer composition is less than 50% phosphorus of a corresponding standard fertilizer composition.
 4. The fertilizer composition of claim 1, wherein the effective amount of the potassium-rich material contained within the nanoparticulated fertilizer composition is less than 50% potassium of a corresponding standard fertilizer composition.
 5. The fertilizer composition of claim 1, wherein the effective amount of the nanoparticulated fertilizer composition is less than 5% of a corresponding standard fertilizer composition.
 6. The fertilizer composition of claim 5, wherein the effective amount of the nitrogen-rich material within the nanoparticulated fertilizer composition is less than 5% of nitrogen in a corresponding standard fertilizer composition.
 7. The fertilizer composition of claim 5, wherein the effective amount of the phosphorus-rich material within the nanoparticulated fertilizer composition is less than 5% of phosphorus in a corresponding standard fertilizer composition.
 8. The fertilizer composition of claim 5, wherein the effective amount of the potassium-rich material within the nanoparticulated fertilizer composition is less than 5% of potassium in a corresponding standard fertilizer composition.
 9. The fertilizer composition of claim 1, wherein the ultrapure water comprises a purity level that falls within a range of about 12 mega ohms to about 18.3 mega ohms. 